Geopolitics and climate change are two interrelated factors, affecting global stability. As global temperatures rise due to carbon emissions, the impacts of climate change are becoming apparent. Countries affected by natural disasters, such as floods and droughts, experience significant political instability. For example, humanitarian crises in sub-Saharan Africa are often triggered by climate shifts that reduce agricultural yields. Inequities in the distribution of water resources also indicate geopolitical tensions. A clear example is the conflict that occurred on the Nile River, where Egypt, Sudan and Ethiopia competed with each other to exploit this water resource. Attempts to build the dam by Ethiopia have been a source of tension, given its impact on Egypt’s water security. In this context, industrialized countries have a moral responsibility to reduce their carbon emissions. However, developing countries often face a dilemma in this regard. They want to improve their economies but are faced with demands to reduce emissions that may slow progress. For example, Indonesia and Brazil must balance industrial development and tropical forest conservation. The energy transition is also a major highlight. Oil-rich countries, such as Saudi Arabia and Russia, may feel threatened by the shift towards renewable energy, as this could damage their heavily oil-dependent economies. Competition in the renewable energy market, such as solar panels and wind, is creating new dynamics in the international arena. Uranium and rare minerals are becoming important commodities in the energy transition. Countries that possess these resources, such as Kazakhstan, play an important role in future energy geopolitics. As countries compete to discover and exploit these mineral resources, the potential for conflict and cooperation increases. Additionally, climate change affects global migration. Many individuals are forced to leave their homes due to natural disasters. This phenomenon creates a refugee crisis, which can change the political dynamics in host countries. The rise of populism regarding immigration has been further exacerbated by disillusionment with the handling of climate change. International engagement is critical in meeting these challenges. The Paris Agreement is an example of global collaboration, although implementation has often been problematic. Countries that fail to fulfill their commitments face political and economic sanctions, which can affect international relations. Public education and awareness also play an important role. Increasing environmental activism shows that the global community cares not only about environmental issues but also their impact on social justice. This movement brings individual voices to the global stage, encouraging governments to take more aggressive action on climate change. From a business perspective, companies that do not adapt to the challenges of climate change may lose their competitive edge. Investments in green technology and sustainable innovation are critical for long-term sustainability. Companies that ignore their environmental responsibilities risk getting a bad reputation and losing consumers who are increasingly concerned about sustainability. As we enter a new era, it is important to understand that climate change is not just an environmental issue, but also an issue closely linked to geopolitics. Sustainability and stability cannot be achieved without effective global collaboration. Interactions between individuals, governments and businesses are key to overcoming these complex challenges.